There is a growing discussion in this country that threatens to drown out the insipid pacifism that permeates the upper and middle layers of the liberal establishment.
The voices now being heard are shouting...."enough!"... defenseless victims in shopping malls and schools. We the people of these United States have the unalienable right to life, liberty and to defend ourselves.
Despite the surrender to violence crowd, more Americans are agreeing that students and just plain shoppers, should have the right to protect themselves from the crazies in our midst.
John Stossel's view is enlightening.
Showing posts with label Gun Control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gun Control. Show all posts
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Saturday, February 16, 2008
National Parks Firearm Vote Pending
Well Congress is now poised to vote on an ammendment to an important Interior Dept. bill which would legalize the carrying of loaded firearms in National Parks.
This amendment is strategically proposed to achieve what the Interior Dept. has thus far failed to voluntarily do, despite over half of Congress voicing support of the change.
It is a political opportunity to show Obama and Clinton for what they are. Will they support a common sense proposal to expand gun rights....or continue to pander to the leftist pacifists in their party?
Law abiding citizens who pass through National Park land, should not have to worry about being arrested. If they are in compliance with state and local law there is no good reason to prevent them from having weapons, loaded or unload in a National Park.
Frankly, I visit National Parks several times a year - and I am concerned about running into trouble in the woods. Yet, I have to make a decision not to carry, even though I have a permit to carry. It does not matter that the odds of running into a dangerous animal or person is remote.
What is the Interior Department's concern.....that I may illegally hunt on federal land? That I may get mad at a hiker and shoot them? The reality is....there is no issue here. Hunters, sportsman, hikers, nature lovers should be allowed to exercise the same freedoms they enjoy outside the parks when they are within the boundaries of a national park.
I doubt if the Dems will allow this amendment to come to a vote. They hate to be forced to make a stand that might offend their base, or jeopardize what ever weak support they currently have among sportsman, hunters and other gun owners.
This amendment is strategically proposed to achieve what the Interior Dept. has thus far failed to voluntarily do, despite over half of Congress voicing support of the change.
It is a political opportunity to show Obama and Clinton for what they are. Will they support a common sense proposal to expand gun rights....or continue to pander to the leftist pacifists in their party?
Law abiding citizens who pass through National Park land, should not have to worry about being arrested. If they are in compliance with state and local law there is no good reason to prevent them from having weapons, loaded or unload in a National Park.
Frankly, I visit National Parks several times a year - and I am concerned about running into trouble in the woods. Yet, I have to make a decision not to carry, even though I have a permit to carry. It does not matter that the odds of running into a dangerous animal or person is remote.
What is the Interior Department's concern.....that I may illegally hunt on federal land? That I may get mad at a hiker and shoot them? The reality is....there is no issue here. Hunters, sportsman, hikers, nature lovers should be allowed to exercise the same freedoms they enjoy outside the parks when they are within the boundaries of a national park.
I doubt if the Dems will allow this amendment to come to a vote. They hate to be forced to make a stand that might offend their base, or jeopardize what ever weak support they currently have among sportsman, hunters and other gun owners.
Labels:
democrats,
Gun Control,
National Parks
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Campus Bloodshed Again
Well, here we go again. Another Campus shooting.
Defenseless in Illinois.
Of course the state legislative would not dare allow law abiding citizens to carry a concealed weapon on campus.
When will the madness end. Well we know that nuts will always be with us and they will likely have access to weapons. Can't we at least even up the odds a little, and give some innocents a fighting chance.
Forget the Campus police.....everyone knows they can't stop this.
Defenseless in Illinois.
Of course the state legislative would not dare allow law abiding citizens to carry a concealed weapon on campus.
When will the madness end. Well we know that nuts will always be with us and they will likely have access to weapons. Can't we at least even up the odds a little, and give some innocents a fighting chance.
Forget the Campus police.....everyone knows they can't stop this.
Labels:
Campus Violence,
Gun Control,
Political Correctness
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Supreme Court Case Gets More Support From Congress
Dick Cheney has joined a majority of Congress in a "friend of the Court" brief to be filed with the Supreme Court....to further support the proposition that the Second Amendment is being violated by the D.C. gun ban.
As it becomes clearer each day that at least politically, D.C.'s gun ban is on the way out...we may not know for several more months how large a victory will be achieved.
While it is likley that an individual's right to own a firearm will be uplheld, the power of government to regulate the sale and possession of firearms may also be sustained.
We can only hope that Dracarion laws, like those in D.C., New York City and Chicago will be undone and a clear message sent to the anti-self-protection crowd.
As for the current moment in Presidential politics....at least John McCain had the good sense to re-afirm his support for the Second Amendment in front of CPAC.
Their will be only one choice for gun owner's in November....and sitting out the election is not one of them.
As it becomes clearer each day that at least politically, D.C.'s gun ban is on the way out...we may not know for several more months how large a victory will be achieved.
While it is likley that an individual's right to own a firearm will be uplheld, the power of government to regulate the sale and possession of firearms may also be sustained.
We can only hope that Dracarion laws, like those in D.C., New York City and Chicago will be undone and a clear message sent to the anti-self-protection crowd.
As for the current moment in Presidential politics....at least John McCain had the good sense to re-afirm his support for the Second Amendment in front of CPAC.
Their will be only one choice for gun owner's in November....and sitting out the election is not one of them.
Labels:
Gun Control,
second amendment,
Supreme Court
Sunday, February 3, 2008
A Right to a Safe Education
The Guns on Campus debate continues as the Right to Carry on Campus comes closer to law in some states.
How many more Virginia Tech's will it take to change the pacifist mind set of the elite liberal establishment.
Of course they won't change their minds.....only state or national legislation will make the change a reality.
The liberal left will continue to support an Obama....who not too long ago advocated confiscation of all handguns.....except for those like Cho....who likely would find a way to evade such a law.....so the left's ultimate vision of a safe society would remain incomplete....since only criminals would be safe....and safe to harm you.
How many more Virginia Tech's will it take to change the pacifist mind set of the elite liberal establishment.
Of course they won't change their minds.....only state or national legislation will make the change a reality.
The liberal left will continue to support an Obama....who not too long ago advocated confiscation of all handguns.....except for those like Cho....who likely would find a way to evade such a law.....so the left's ultimate vision of a safe society would remain incomplete....since only criminals would be safe....and safe to harm you.
Labels:
Gun Control,
gun free zones,
Obama
Saturday, January 19, 2008
Time to Check Your Briefs
The Supremes are getting to those briefs....filed in the DC Gun Ban Case.
Some are predictable....others enlightening.
Some are predictable....others enlightening.
Labels:
District of Columbia,
Gun Control,
Supreme Court
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Dems Want a New Assault Weapons Ban
Surprise....surprise, at the recent Las Vegas Democratic debate all of the contenders vowed support for a new assault weapons ban.
Their conventional wisdom is that more crime is being committed with AK-47s.
Of course they are ignorant of the facts. Of course they fail to mention that AK-47s were allowed during the previous ban...just not those with flash suppressors etc.
Hopefully.....there unambiguous support for a failed law will further alienate gun owners and bolster Republican chances in the fall.
Their conventional wisdom is that more crime is being committed with AK-47s.
Of course they are ignorant of the facts. Of course they fail to mention that AK-47s were allowed during the previous ban...just not those with flash suppressors etc.
Hopefully.....there unambiguous support for a failed law will further alienate gun owners and bolster Republican chances in the fall.
Labels:
democrats,
Gun Control
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Have We Been Betrayed?
The Solicitor General has asked the Supreme Court to uphold the position that the Federal Government has the right to regulate the ownership of firearms - this is part of the Governments brief in the D.C. Gun Ban Supreme Court case.
Is this a betrayal of Republican support for the Second Amendment?
Many think so.
A WEB petition invites you to register your view.
Personally, I never expected the US Government to not assert it's authority to regulate firearms as part of this case. What is more important to most of us....is the prevailing view....that this case should establish....that the right to bear Arms....is an Individual Right.
Is this a betrayal of Republican support for the Second Amendment?
Many think so.
A WEB petition invites you to register your view.
Personally, I never expected the US Government to not assert it's authority to regulate firearms as part of this case. What is more important to most of us....is the prevailing view....that this case should establish....that the right to bear Arms....is an Individual Right.
Labels:
Gun Control
San Francisco Values
Those poor libs in San Francisco. Seems like they just can't get their way no matter how extreme they are.
The SF loons voted for a complete gun ban. This well suited 58% of the wimps living there.
Too bad for the other 42% of the population that might have just cared a little about protecting their own lives.
Luckily, a court just ruled the gun ban law is illegal.
Perhaps there is still some justice left in California.
The SF loons voted for a complete gun ban. This well suited 58% of the wimps living there.
Too bad for the other 42% of the population that might have just cared a little about protecting their own lives.
Luckily, a court just ruled the gun ban law is illegal.
Perhaps there is still some justice left in California.
Labels:
Gun Ban,
Gun Control,
San Francisco
Friday, January 4, 2008
Not All Gun Control is Unreasonable
The New Jersey Legislature is on its way to pass 3 laws that will increase penalties for gun violations and are targeted against illegal purchasers and gang violence.
On the surface these proposals do not seem unreasonable.
So....as gun owners, are we better off resisting all new gun laws.....or as I believe aren't we smarter to support changes that will reduce gun violence but resist those that go beyond addressing reasonable concerns and unfairly limit the freedom of law abiding citizens.
On the surface these proposals do not seem unreasonable.
So....as gun owners, are we better off resisting all new gun laws.....or as I believe aren't we smarter to support changes that will reduce gun violence but resist those that go beyond addressing reasonable concerns and unfairly limit the freedom of law abiding citizens.
Labels:
Gun Control
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
Will the Supreme Court Rule
Washington, DC....one of the most dangerous places on earth, is now asking the Supreme Court to support its position that citizens do not have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms.
Mr. Fenty, DC's current champion of freedom and justice for all, hopes the Supremes will reverse the Federal Appeals Court ruling that cites DC's draconian gun laws as unconstitutional.
I thought his honor would demur to Democratic politicians who did not want this issue coming before the court and especially not during a Presidential campaign.
Now Ms. Hillary and company will have to answer the question....Do you solemnly swear to defend and support the constitution of the United States, so help you God....including the Second Amendment....that provides for the right of the people.......not the militia.....to keep and bear arms.
This embarrassing question will be posed to those freedom loving liberals who will then hem and haw, which most of the electorate will see as evidence of weakness....at least those inclined to care about their Second Amendment rights.
Excellent chance that the Court will take the case and rule before November 2008. Excellent chance that it will affirm the Individual right to keep and bear arms.
Mr. Fenty, DC's current champion of freedom and justice for all, hopes the Supremes will reverse the Federal Appeals Court ruling that cites DC's draconian gun laws as unconstitutional.
I thought his honor would demur to Democratic politicians who did not want this issue coming before the court and especially not during a Presidential campaign.
Now Ms. Hillary and company will have to answer the question....Do you solemnly swear to defend and support the constitution of the United States, so help you God....including the Second Amendment....that provides for the right of the people.......not the militia.....to keep and bear arms.
This embarrassing question will be posed to those freedom loving liberals who will then hem and haw, which most of the electorate will see as evidence of weakness....at least those inclined to care about their Second Amendment rights.
Excellent chance that the Court will take the case and rule before November 2008. Excellent chance that it will affirm the Individual right to keep and bear arms.
Labels:
Gun Control,
second amendment
Thursday, July 5, 2007
Another Media Outrage
Last March, the Roanoke Times decided to "out" thousands of CCW holders in Virginia. Now the same tactic has been used by an Ohio newspaper.
The Roanoke Times ceased its actions after a huge outcry, but so far the small minded newspaper editor involved in the Ohio incident is still defending their actions.
This type of attack on gun owners will continue until state laws are enacted making such release of sensitive information illegal.
So if you live in Ohio, start contacting your state legislators.
The Roanoke Times ceased its actions after a huge outcry, but so far the small minded newspaper editor involved in the Ohio incident is still defending their actions.
This type of attack on gun owners will continue until state laws are enacted making such release of sensitive information illegal.
So if you live in Ohio, start contacting your state legislators.
Labels:
CCW,
Gun Control,
media bias,
second amendment
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Bloomberg The Turncoat Again
Well America's Anti-Second Amendment mayor Bloomberg of NYC is now switching sides again.
First he was a Democrat, ...then he decided he wanted the NYC Mayor's job....so he ran as a Republican.....Now he wants to be President.....so now he is switching from Republican to Independent status.
I predict...he will announce his run for the White House.....and that this will propel Fred Thompson to the White House.
No self-respecting semi-conservative could ever vote for this shallow, elitist, egotist, megalomaniac.
First he was a Democrat, ...then he decided he wanted the NYC Mayor's job....so he ran as a Republican.....Now he wants to be President.....so now he is switching from Republican to Independent status.
I predict...he will announce his run for the White House.....and that this will propel Fred Thompson to the White House.
No self-respecting semi-conservative could ever vote for this shallow, elitist, egotist, megalomaniac.
Labels:
Gun Control,
second amendment
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Gun Bill Moves Forward in Congress
Efforts to prevent the mentally ill from getting guns are moving forward in Congress.
All eyes are on this bill.
Will Senate Democrats let this bill get passed without ugly amendments?
All eyes are on this bill.
Will Senate Democrats let this bill get passed without ugly amendments?
Labels:
Gun Control
Monday, June 11, 2007
Handgun Limits
Well, New Jersey is considering joining the ranks of 3 other states which limit handgun purchases to one per month.
So what's so bad about this?
Having lived with these restrictions for some time, I personally see no issues.
Buying one gun per month gives most folks the ability to defend themselves from most anything.
The reason for the limit - it may reduce straw purchase activity for illegal buyers (i.e., gangs etc.)
Is there any proof that this restriction is saving lives? I don't think so. But as far as handgun restrictions go, this one looks worse than it actually is.
Many argue that once in place the limits will change to "one handgun a year" or "one handgun every 10 years". Don't think we need to really worry about that.
And why not worry?
Because it politics. And most everyone knows that you can only push gun control so far before it becomes a political liability (Democrats know this).
When gun control running amok, is no longer a political time bomb....then worry...worry a lot.
So what's so bad about this?
Having lived with these restrictions for some time, I personally see no issues.
Buying one gun per month gives most folks the ability to defend themselves from most anything.
The reason for the limit - it may reduce straw purchase activity for illegal buyers (i.e., gangs etc.)
Is there any proof that this restriction is saving lives? I don't think so. But as far as handgun restrictions go, this one looks worse than it actually is.
Many argue that once in place the limits will change to "one handgun a year" or "one handgun every 10 years". Don't think we need to really worry about that.
And why not worry?
Because it politics. And most everyone knows that you can only push gun control so far before it becomes a political liability (Democrats know this).
When gun control running amok, is no longer a political time bomb....then worry...worry a lot.
Labels:
Gun Control,
New Jersey
Friday, June 8, 2007
Illinois - A State of Mind
I now have a better understanding of why CCW isn't happening in the state of Illinois.
Seems like Chicago liberals have a stranglehold on all Second Amendment issues.
So why have the good law abiding citizens of this state put up with this for so long.
Obviously, gun rights groups are so far ineffective in getting attention.
Perhaps their voices will be heard in the next round of elections. (Wait a minute....Doesn't that Obama guy come from that state?....Oh well.)
Seems like Chicago liberals have a stranglehold on all Second Amendment issues.
So why have the good law abiding citizens of this state put up with this for so long.
Obviously, gun rights groups are so far ineffective in getting attention.
Perhaps their voices will be heard in the next round of elections. (Wait a minute....Doesn't that Obama guy come from that state?....Oh well.)
Labels:
CCW,
Gun Control,
second amendment
Sunday, June 3, 2007
Registration Mania in California
Well California here I come....or should the title of the song be California there I never go!
Seems, Calif. Pols think people need to be checked out when buying ammo and a detailed records need to be kept. For what purpose? Obviously no real practical reason, other than to make politicians feel good that somehow this will reduce crime?
I think its time to start a national registry of flaky people, those with superficial thoughts and behaviors, those that distort the national culture, those that inhibit clear thinking and overall civil behavior. I think we can start this registry in California and maybe it will save some lives.
Seems, Calif. Pols think people need to be checked out when buying ammo and a detailed records need to be kept. For what purpose? Obviously no real practical reason, other than to make politicians feel good that somehow this will reduce crime?
I think its time to start a national registry of flaky people, those with superficial thoughts and behaviors, those that distort the national culture, those that inhibit clear thinking and overall civil behavior. I think we can start this registry in California and maybe it will save some lives.
Labels:
Gun Control
Sunday, May 20, 2007
Does Anyone Have a Stamp?
How about this for a new way to catch criminals. Lets micro stamp each cartridge fired with the gun type, serial number etc.
When the bad guys leave spent cases behind, now LEOs can easily find them?
This is getting traction and may become law.
So what's wrong with the idea.
1. It will added modest costs to each new semi-auto sold
2. Criminals will not hesitate to use some abrasive to mark up the bolt face and destroy the ability to micro stamp the case.
Some bad folks may actually get caught because of this new tool.....especially those who firing the gun without pre-mediation.
Is this foolish legislation ?
Maybe if it can actually help LEOs, and its not obtrusive technology, well maybe its a good idea?
When the bad guys leave spent cases behind, now LEOs can easily find them?
This is getting traction and may become law.
So what's wrong with the idea.
1. It will added modest costs to each new semi-auto sold
2. Criminals will not hesitate to use some abrasive to mark up the bolt face and destroy the ability to micro stamp the case.
Some bad folks may actually get caught because of this new tool.....especially those who firing the gun without pre-mediation.
Is this foolish legislation ?
Maybe if it can actually help LEOs, and its not obtrusive technology, well maybe its a good idea?
Labels:
Gun Control,
second amendment
Thursday, May 17, 2007
The Mayor's Choice
Mayor Fenty of D.C. has plenty of thinking to do, and lots of folks who want him to take the Parker case to the Supreme Court. But he has lots of others who wish he wouldn't. The Washington Post presents the choices in a surprisingly balanced way.
I hope the case goes to the high court. But as mention in prior posts, there are very solid political reasons not to let it happen.
I hope the case goes to the high court. But as mention in prior posts, there are very solid political reasons not to let it happen.
Labels:
Gun Control,
second amendment
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Gun Giveaway Politics
Governor Kaine of Virginia wants to have it both ways. How typical of a politician when it comes to guns - and of Democrats.
Kaine just signed a law making it a felony to "sting" an FFL in VA without VA permission and VA/Federal LEO involvement.
Now, as reported in the Washington Post, he just doesn't understand why the VCDL is conducting a gun giveaway in a Fairfax County building.
Of course he knows why its being done.
This is democracy at work - the only reason the Dems in VA are upset is that the VCDL is playing it smart and this really makes the locals politicians nervous.
More power to the VCDL.
Kaine just signed a law making it a felony to "sting" an FFL in VA without VA permission and VA/Federal LEO involvement.
Now, as reported in the Washington Post, he just doesn't understand why the VCDL is conducting a gun giveaway in a Fairfax County building.
Of course he knows why its being done.
- The giveaway supports the intent of the legislation he just signed
- It supports FFL holders in VA
- It sends a message to the Bloombergs of America
- It sends a message to the government of Virginia - Citizens will support their rights
- It is perfectly legal and ethical
This is democracy at work - the only reason the Dems in VA are upset is that the VCDL is playing it smart and this really makes the locals politicians nervous.
More power to the VCDL.
Labels:
ffl,
Gun Control,
VCDL,
Virginia Gun Laws
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)